Showing posts with label belief. Show all posts
Showing posts with label belief. Show all posts

Sunday, 21 October 2018

the sea: cloud (an epilogue)



Cloud, from old english Clud [mass of rock or earth] 

Cloud Seed #1

Dirt from the construction site where buildings are beginning to be formed lifts up and moves into the atmosphere. Once a part of the earth's crust now set loose into the air: a potential staging ground for the condensation of water vapor; seeds for the formation of a cloud. 

No more permanent that anything else. Everything is a momentary apparition. Oh, but beauty. My eyes open each morning, and some mornings are full, like a song that makes me sing along. I am here. I am here. And it will not be forever. Thankfully. Because there is too much to see, and nothing would be worth trying to remember if my eyes will open every morning like a hose spraying infinite nows. Nothing is worth feeling if it can be felt anytime, always.

Cloud seed #2

A man who spent half of his Saturday afternoon kicking a can down the promenade comes home and shakes his jacket before hanging it on the coat rack.  Small crystals of salt, deposited on his jacket from the spray of the sea are set loose, moving out of the open window and into the atmosphere.  The salt crystals mix with the dust from the construction site, more water vapor condenses, freezes and the cloud is growing.

And looking at The Sea. Looking at the sea. From up here. “And now we are here. The dinner is ready and we cannot eat. The meat sits in the white lake of its dish. The wine waits.”[1]

 “Who watched the forms of the clouds over this part of the earth a thousand years ago? Who watches them today?”[2]We will watch and we will try to hold on, but surely they will change. We will cry – tears falling up into the sky – cuss – spittle flying under the clouds' haunted arches – we will roll in the meadow inhaling the mist while stains form on our trousers – whelm of joy mixed with dread – we will lay on our backs looking up listening to the sound of the blades of grass flittering in the wind and remember nothing is worth feeling if it can be felt anytime, always.

Cloud Seed #3

Sitting at the bar at dusk, watching the dusty antiques on the wall lose their definition with the fading of the light; a mass was forming before the drunkards’ eyes. Looking down at his drink, trying to avoid the scene, he suddenly felt an absence forming behind him. He fell of his stool, bumped off a table and a couple of chairs before he stumbled out the door.  It was damp outside; it was as if the clouds were sleeping in the street. Trying to make out the shadowy forms through the misty veil before his eyes, he picked a point and staggered towards it. After walking for some time, bumping off of various landmarks-changing his course with each bump, he could feel his body gaining weight from the droplets of water collecting on his skin and clothing, after some time he was swimming in the cloud and after some time he was becoming it. 

“What is in any [Sea] ocean but a multitude of drops?” [3] An awesome body of matter all tangled up more incapable of seeming an object than land, but then there’s air, The Sea as the entropic middle. And this, viewed from a distance, the edge of the universe perhaps, looks like Brownian motion, all of it bouncing around and against itself, changing course, the collection of these glancing blows becoming lives. Matter drifting in the system with the illusion of acting. But one cannot bounce off of belief - and vicious acts, or virtuous acts, are precipitated by belief. But without invoking some grand narrative in which to protect our fragility, why can’t small joy be joy? We can drift, and appreciate the view, and seek to collect these views into a remembered joy, always more possibility in the future, until there is no more future. Smiling into the face of a finite existence of little lasting result, manufacturing small meanings that add up, a joy in having participated instead of being frozen in the want of gifted meaning.  

Cloud Seed #4

Down below a couple is sleeping side-by-side covers up to their chins.  Clouds are forming in front of their mouths with the rise and fall of their chests.  Quietly, while they dream their bodies are regenerating tissues.  They wake up in the morning look in the mirror, see themselves the same face, look at each other say “good morning” seeing nothing as changed, maybe only the date on the calendar, but everything has changed. Everything. Clouds.  Each morning we wake up and meet our self ... meet the world. Our mostly-water bodies, our loose collection of matter, regenerating always. Clouds. “ We are all potential fossils still carrying within our bodies the crudities of former existences, the marks of the world in which living creatures flow with little more consistency than clouds from age to age.”[4] But only the crud, none of the actual stuff. And still our hearts hurt when they are broken. Still we collect something. Small, tiny in fact, but ours (us).

An object is like a pattern of movement instead of a solid separate thing that exists autonomously. [5] Look through the microscope and pick your favorite, follow it closely, like a star, like drift wood, like a maybe-face in a cloud. Organization used to be understood as order. Databases, cordoned off, categorized. But clouds. Leaving those things we collect where they lay, and giving them keywords, signs, so that we might search for them later, the algorithm, the duplicitous web (put it in the cloud), cloud computing, more reliable, and more appropriate to our shifting understanding of relationships; time going by, entropic ephemeral re-structuring. Us to the world, us to nature, coffee to the morning, the world to the world.

“As for astronomy, the difficulty of recognizing the movement of the earth consisted in renouncing the immediate feeling of the immobility of the earth and the similar feeling of the movement of the planets, so for history the difficulty of recognizing the subjection of the person to the laws of space, time, and causes consists in renouncing the immediate feeling of the independence of one’s person. In the first case, the need was to renounce the consciousness of a nonexistent immobility in space and recognize a movement we do not feel; in the present case, it is just as necessary to renounce a nonexistent freedom and recognize a dependence we do not feel.”[6]

Clouds are like momentary apparitions; their possibility is in the air always, like mist settling down in the cool evening before burning off in new sun. A cloud looks like an object, but isn’t it really just the way air looks when the atmosphere conspires to make it so? I am a cloud.


[1] Strand, Mark. Reasons For Moving, Darker & The Sargentville Notebook, New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2006, p. 75
[2] Thoreau, Henry David. Autumn From the Journal of Henry David Thoreau. Boston: Houghton, Mifflin &Co., 1892, p. 429
[3] Mitchell, David. Cloud Atlas, New York: Random House, 2004. p. 509
[4] Eisley, Loren. The Immense Journey, New York: Vintage, 1959.
[5] Bohm, David. On Creativity. London: Routledge, 1998.
[6] Tolstoy, Leo. War and Peace. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2007, p. 1214

This epilogue text is by Stephen Fiehn & Tyler Myers / Cupola Bobber.

Wednesday, 28 January 2009

job description


Just back from Warsaw, where I had been invited to give a presentation about being a dramaturg at a conference of practitioners and academics from Poland, Germany, Britain and elsewhere. Some lovely people, and the odd exquisite presentation, particularly one by the German dramaturg Dunje Funke about a sited project in Neukoln, Berlin - alongside quite a lot of the usual nose-down reading of the dense writerly thing that was never-meant-to-be-spoken-aloud, with the listener's predicament (as Gary Winters recently described his experience of another conference) like that of someone 'hitting the ground running, bang in the middle of someone else's research'. The sprinting simultaneous translators were impressively game, with only the occasional linguistic oddity: e.g. lengthy discussion of the celebrated 'herbal scene of Ophelia' in Hamlet. The opening session of the conference was rather disconcertingly entitled 'Dramaturg: man or fish' - as if those were the only two options.

On the way there, at Luton Airport, standing behind two young Polish women and their English friends in the check-in queue. The women were explaining why it was time to go home now, once and for all, enough's enough. After three years of really trying to make a go of it, it had become oh so clear that England was actually 'shit'. They were delighted to be leaving.

*****

I didn't see much of Warsaw, most of my time there was spent either at the conference in the Goethe Institute, or walking to and from the hotel. Past the American Embassy, with huge concrete crash-barriers at its entrance, a lot of security. Past towering statues of earnest men in huge lead-like coats with impressively droopy moustaches, looking ponderous. Past an enormous Charles de Gaulle, stepping out in slightly dandy-ish fashion in his uniform. Past some very eccentric antiquarian bookshops, their window displays offering surreal conjunctions of materials that reminded me of images encountered during the Parisian drifts of Breton or Aragon. I spent one evening wandering around the 'old city': a reconstruction from old photographs and paintings of that section of the city that was utterly destroyed and levelled by retreating Germans and advancing Russians at the end of World War 2. A peculiar place: beautiful, in an uncanny and almost deserted way, the patina of its long pre-history erased, like an architect's scale model of the urban shapes that once housed memory with all traces of the embodied memories themselves cauterised in the utter-burn of history. A replica reinstated without the weathering of centuries of time and people.

Its theatrical artifice reminded me of a passage from Isabel Fonseca's Bury Me Standing: The Gypsies and their Journey (1996): 'The "Old Town" is a cobble-stoned reconstruction of Ye Olde Warsawe, an impeccable Baroque theme park completed in the 1970s. The sense of a stage set, perhaps again to be struck by terrible historical forces: this is the flavour of the unease one feels here, where the names of streets are still changing, and where, in the Ghetto, the foundations of buildings are cracking open. The rubble of the past is actually pressing through, and you stand there staring, as if waiting for a pair of trembling hands to emerge from a crevasse. Perhaps those who rebuilt the area, razed after the Uprising, didn't want to bury or sweep away the past. (Though not much fuss is made over survivor sensitivities: for example, Orbis, the state-owned travel agency, chose as its headquarters the very spot where the buses left the Ghetto for Treblinka)' (198-9).

*****

As part of my presentation about working as a dramaturg in contemporary performance, I referred to the ongoing collaboration with Lone Twin Theatre. I had asked Gregg & Gary beforehand if they could tell me what it is they thought I was, or could, or should be doing with them. In an email called 'job description' (7.1.2009) Gregg sent me the following, which I read in full at the conference:

Dear colleagues


David Williams has asked us for a job description. David has worked with Lone Twin Theatre as dramaturg since 2005. His request suggests that for the last 4 years David hasn’t totally understood what it is he’s been doing. Indeed had any of you the pleasure of witnessing David at ‘work’ you may have come to a similar conclusion. However the request has been made, and in the spirit that one is never too old to learn something new, David, here it is in 5 points:


1. As dramaturg to Lone Twin Theatre you will have spent some years in the company of Gregg Whelan and Gary Winters slowly earning their trust and respect. You will have extensive experience of their practice and have seen a great number of their performances. Although you hold said ‘practice’ and said ‘performances’ in high esteem, this won’t stop you entering the dressing room post-performance and asking in a quiet, unrushed, supportive tone: ‘what the fuck was that?’


2. You will have the ability to see things that aren’t there. After perhaps two hours of a group exercise in which for all involved very little has been achieved, save the need for a lie down, you will raise your head from your small black notepad and suggest in a quiet, unrushed, supportive tone: ‘it’s there, something is there, I can’t say what is, but it’s there, something is there’. You will remain unmoved when asked to ‘be quiet David, we’re trying to sleep’


3. You will believe, with all of your heart, in everything that happens in a room between eight people.


4. You will embark on a journey, taking on an idea, finding its form, its shape, what it is that’s funny about it and what it is that’s sad about it. You will care for it. You will know each part of it. You will be familiar with its texture, its type, its mode. You will know how it rests, how it plays and how it works. You will hold the idea in your head, in your hands, in your legs. You will ask, towards the end of the process in a quiet, unrushed, supportive tone: ‘perhaps this is the one I should be in? I really understand this one, I think I’m perfect for it, you know, I really feel this one, I could do this one’. You will be unmoved when asked to ‘be quiet David, we’re trying to sleep’


5. You will believe, with all of your heart, in everything that happens in a room between eight people.